On Dec 06 2000, Robert Waldner wrote:
> I still use a 2.0.38-kernel (that box is only apt-get upgrade´d, not - 
>  dist-upgraded, to potato) because of some legacy-software, so for me
>  it´s essential that kernel-version-dependencies are correct ;-)

        Oh, I see. But I think that I read somewhere that you can make
        Samba work fine with 2.0 kernels if you recompile it. So, that
        may be a thing that you might try (and I sincerely don't know
        what the package maintainer could do in this case, unless he
        creates two packages or he includes duplicate binaries and
        wrapper scripts).

> I´ve filed a bug-report against samba 2.0.7, so let´s just sit back,
> wait&see.

        Well, I've sent Eloy Paris (Debian's Samba maintainer) a
        bugreport a looooog time ago (MONTHS ago) and didn't hear back
        from him yet. :-(

        So, all that I can say is good luck. :-)


        []s, Roger...

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Reply via email to