on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 03:44:42PM -0500, MaD dUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > also sprach Robert Tucker (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 11:40:07PM -0800): > > Can I change my mind about this partition scheme later? If not, your > > earlier recommendation included several more partitions and I'd like > > to understand the change in thought. I don't have a problem with > > partitions. It is my understanding that partitions add a margin of > > 'safety' to the system. > > no, you won't be able to change that scheme (at least not easily). > yes, they add to security, but you need to understand the implications > first. however, given the excessive space that you have, i'd say go > for it. there's almost nothing that can go wrong.
Hadn't been following this thread closely, but my $0.02 on partitioning can be found at http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/partition.html Cheers. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
pgpfbyiGMcV5m.pgp
Description: PGP signature