On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:17:14PM +0200, MaD dUCK wrote: > also sprach Bob Nielsen (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:42:23AM -0700): > > True, but you can/should configure and compile separately for each > > destination architecture, optimizing appropriately. > > so yes, the argument that my athlon (thunderbird actually) will > outperform the others still holds. but i'd need to keep separate > source trees if i didn't want to make clean every single time - which > i usually don't since i experiment a whole lot and therefore change > the kernel - which doesn't take long thanks to make unless i make > cleaned it...
I tend to make clean every time, since I caused myself some problems in the past by omitting that step. Of course, time is relative. Compile time on an athlon compared to that on a 486 (well, you know....) Bob
