On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:15:56AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:37:54 -0600 Jamin Collins > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you've got another viable option, I'm sure we'd love to hear it. > > Uhhhh, update the packaging system to handle this not uncommon > problem.
Great, I'll get right on that. Oh wait, there no indication of how. Sure, we can just "change" the packaging system. However, there's a *lot* more to it than just waiving a magic wand or hacking a few lines of code. Someone would need to come up with system (including the internal mechanics) that denotes how this could/should be done. > Surely having the source and, indeed, being in the project that came > up with the whole packaging scheme might, I dunno, make that the > tiniest possibility? Simply having the source isn't a blanket panacea to the problem. There's still the more than trivial problem of *how* it would be done. -- Jamin W. Collins -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
