Hi,
I am using Windows as my main system at the moment. I have tried various
distributions in the past (Suse, Mandrake, Redhat). The Linux-systems I
tried could never fully replace my Windows desktop. Unstable application
software was one reason, the amount of hacking required another.
With some of the major applications reaching 1.x, I believe now is the time
to give Linux another shot. Besides I don't want to upgrade to WinXP.
I know Debian is more difficult to install, but I hope I will benefit by
learning a lot. The default install for Redhat 7.3 is quite nice, but
adapting it to my needs is a lot of work. I might as well try Debian and
only install things I really need to avoid bloat.
I have downloaded a Woody-iso, and managed to install a minimal system with
internet-access. All is well.
I do have a few questions about package-management.
Once Woody becomes stable, do the packages (even if unchanged) require
upgrading?
Where do I go for packages that are not yet part of one of the dists?
If I install software in /usr/local, as I understand it, I bypass Debian
package management. If I want to run current software (as in Redhat or
Mandrake current) will I need to install a lot of software in usr/local?
Basically I want to know if it's possible to have a system that respects
the Debian guidelines, but is more up to date in regards to
desktop/application software?
I want to avoid format disks and install again every three months, but
rather have a stable, open-ended system that I can adapt to my needs.
I hope I have made clear what I want to do and would like to know about
experiences from other people. Please tell me if I am wrong in choosing
Debian for my needs. I want to and have time to learn, but would like to
have an indication whether my goals are reachable.
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]