On Sunday 20 November 2005 20:23, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Carl Fink wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:46:12AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >> > Not again this crap. Unsubbing everyone from UOL is the lazy way >> > out, there are better methods to track down the exact mail address >> > causing trouble. >> >> Use one. Yourself. Now. Who is the problem? > >I don't have access to gluck.d.o, or I would have. Watch the tone. > >And I think a less lazy/kneejerk method than unsubbing everyone > @uol.com.br *WAS* used, or did you not notice you are not receiving > antispam uol mails anymore for at least 24h now?
Ahh, but I am. Now I'm trying to determine which mailing list is still contaminated. > I didn't get any for > 48h or so, actually. Since I didn't notice any cries from UOL users in > other brazilian mailing lists and forums, I don't think they were all > unsubbed and banned. > >-- > "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring > them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond > where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot > Henrique Holschuh -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.36% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
