Hal, thx very much for your comment! Deephay
On 4/20/06, Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 20 April 2006 02:23, Deephay wrote: > > Greetings all, > > > > I am wondering that if it is safe to using the testing distro (now > > Etch) as the server's OS. > > Any comment is appreciated very much. > > thx! > > > > Deepahy > > I have a small business and if my servers are down, I'm not making > money. > > It's up to you, of course, but the ONLY version of ANY distro I trust on > my servers is Debian Stable. I *know* that, except for one bug with > aptitude and grub menus, that if I use "aptitude upgrade" that my > servers will keep working. That is not always true with Testing. You > can do an aptitude upgrade or apt-get upgrade with Testing and, even if > bugs are not listed, you could still end up with important programs not > working. > > In most cases, you can get the functions most systems need from Stable. > Is the chance of an important function on your server not working worth > the features not yet in Stable? > > Like I said, it's your choice, but I'm not going to let my clients ever > see me with a moment of downtime that I can prevent. You may feel > otherwise. > > Just my pigheaded, arrogant, self-righteous comments. > > Hal > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
