Paul Johnson wrote: >> Sorry, no. On anything bigger than your personal mail >> server, Qmail is going to require replacing with a modern MTA. > > There's a reason to not like it other than just djb-damage?
Aside from DJB (which is big reason enough for me), the biggest reason why I wouldn't touch qmail with ten-feet pole is vendor lock-in. With reasonably complicated configuration of sendmail/postfix/exim you can switch between each other with reasonable amount of work. With qmail (in either direction) you just have to start from scratch. Binaries in /var/qmail/bin (which is fixed in Debian) are just the tip of the iceberg that DJB wants to do things in other way than the rest of the world. I am affected by qmail on the server my primary domain is hosted (I don't have root password there) and it is really PITA to dance around qmail issues. Just say "No". More thorough (and from much more authoritative source) discussion is on http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/index.php?page=warez#djb Matěj -- 23 Marion St. #3, Cambridge, MA 02141, (617) 876-1259 http://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, map http://tinyurl.com/r2lfa GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC A GOOD name is rather to be chosen than great riches. -- Proverbs 22:1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
