On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:40:01 +0200 Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ron Johnson wrote: > [snip] > >> I am playing the Devil's advocate here. So I might as well fulfill my > >> role. So, you're saying God was merciful on Isaac because a lamb was > >> sacrificed instead. Fine. So God demanded cruelty to an animal, which > >> is also against our modern laws. > > > > Cruelty? Where does that come from? > > > > Or are you a vegan? > > No, but I don't think it is right to kill an animal for any purpose than > to eat it, or perhaps to end it's suffering. But, that's where we can What possible logical / moral justification do you have for that distinction? If one believes that there's some purpose to animal sacrifice, and the Bible clearly does, than how on earth can you conclude that that purpose is any less of a legitimate one than nourishment? [snip] > Joe Celejar -- mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]