-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/11/07 10:33, Amy Templeton wrote: > John Hassler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Amy Templeton wrote: >>> Well, sweet! So the impression I'm getting is that reverse >>> engineering is basically protected by law? > >> When done for interoperability. > >>> So that means that I could use decoder programs without fearing >>> that they may become illegal? > >> No. > > Oh well. Well, in that case, I stand by my original position: I do > not want to get used to depending on decoders if I can't have some > degree of assurance they'll be available later. > > On a positive note, I recently did actually get through to someone > (next year she plans not to use any .docs on her little area on the > school website)!
Great. What techniques did you use to convince her? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGRPI+S9HxQb37XmcRAs2dAKCI4DKo7SMAfJCykDxumLj94uMISQCcDVyw deagEN/f/XxNj5qKJWpGq+Q= =DIds -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
