On Thursday 17 July 2003 02:05, Christopher L. Everett wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > >On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 23:43, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
> > > >Does top(1) indicate excess memory or CPU usage? > > When the problem is at its very worst mozilla is using 98+% of the CPU . > RAM footprint seems fairly modest, less than what I was used to with > the 1.0.0-woody mozilla package. This sounds like the problem I am having with Konqueror. Today it happened with Netscape 4.77. Both from stable packages. Caught Netscape using 98%+ today. It was website related. When Konqueror locks it seems like top doesn't even work correctly. I loaded Mozilla Firebird from an upstream tarball today for i686. Went to the offending website and Firebird sailed through with no problems. I tried Mozilla from the upstream source on the notion that websites are getting increasingly IE-ized (read that nearly all browsing is with IE now). I guessed that Mozilla has the best chance of being IE compatible right now. I don't know if my reasoning is correct, but the end result was desireable. I hope that my reasoning is incorrect. You might try getting the upstream Mozilla Firebird tarball and experimenting on your own. Maybe there's just a bug in the woody package. -- Mike Mueller -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]