Reply to: thorntreeh...@gmail.com
Original Message Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:59:20 -0700
RE: Re: regarding upgrade   [See Original Message Below]

Wicked.  Thanks for that.

-----------------------------------------
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:59:20 -0700  thorntreeh...@gmail.com wrote:

>On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:31:47 -0400, machiner posted:
>
>> Reply to: edua...@kalinowski.com.br
>> Original Message Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:21:51 -0300 RE: Re: regarding
>> upgrade   [See Original Message Below]
>> 
>> They do "reappear" after a grub update.  Personally, I "usually" remove an
>> unused kernel because I run a tight ship.
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------- On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:21:51
>> -0300  edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
>> 
>>>machiner wrote:
>>>> Sorry, I think I'm replying to Paul instead of the OP, but I deleted
>>>> that original post from my email.
>>>>
>>>> If you don't want to remove the kernel you're not using for whatever
>>>> reason, just edit: /boot/grub/menu.lst and comment out the 8 lines that
>>>> comprise the 2 kernel options of the kernel image you don't want to
>>>> use.
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>This will not allow you to use the kernel (which is OK if you don't need
>>>it), but they are still in your HD taking up space.
>>>
>>>Also, I think they will reappear if update-grub is called, which happens
>>>when a kernel is installed or removed, for example.
>>>
>>>
>
>Whether they appear or not (or more precisely, how many of them "appear")
>after the update-grub script is run is controlled by the option "howmany"
>in the options for the AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST in your /boot/grub/menu.lst. 
>
>




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to