jidanni wrote: > Why must emacs depend on sound packages? I had never noticed that. Pretty objectionable, I think. I have no use for sound in Emacs. It should be at most a "Suggests".
Chris Jones writes: > I don't want to turn this into a flamewar, but couldn't you use another > editor, like vi, vim, nano, pico or ed? I use both Emacs and Vi. > ... and there you have it.. I think that the correct answer is that emacs > is not an editor.. Its primary function is editing. Therefor it is an editor. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
