On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:02:09PM EDT, John Hasler wrote: > jidanni wrote: > > Why must emacs depend on sound packages? > > I had never noticed that. Pretty objectionable, I think. I have no use > for sound in Emacs. It should be at most a "Suggests". > > Chris Jones writes: > > I don't want to turn this into a flamewar, but couldn't you use another > > editor, like vi, vim, nano, pico or ed? > > I use both Emacs and Vi. > > > ... and there you have it.. I think that the correct answer is that emacs > > is not an editor.. > > Its primary function is editing. Therefor it is an editor.
Sorry, forgot the smiley. CJ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
