On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote: > > Yeah i came across that but i'd assume DVI to be superior (i.e. more > > recent, hence better) than VGA... Also, could the monitor's EDID be > > reporting erroneous values? > > I switched to VGA to give it a try, these are the results: > > DVI: > # xrandr > Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024 > default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm > 1280x1024 60.0* > 1280x960 60.0 > 1152x864 60.0 > 1024x768 60.0 > 800x600 60.0 56.0 > 640x480 60.0 > > RGB: > # xrandr > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600 > default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm > 800x600 60.0* 56.0 > 640x480 60.0 > 400x300 60.0 56.0 > 320x240 60.0 >
These look like the basic VESA resolutions. I wonder if you could force any additional resolutions by adding custom modelines to your xorg.conf file. dt -- Dave Thayer | Whenever you read a good book, it's like the Denver, Colorado USA | author is right there, in the room talking to d...@thayer-boyle.com | you, which is why I don't like to read | good books. - Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org