I read somewhere that although optimize for size will decrease the size of the kernel on the disk, not optimizing for size will increase the performance of the kernel, at least during the boot stage, as it won't be compressed and can be read without having to uncompress it first. Is this mistaken? If not, given the size of most hard disks, I'd rather have the kernel take up an extra few mb's in order to have a faster boot time. No?
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Robert P. J. Day
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Paul Cartwright
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Robert P. J. Day
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Paul Cartwright
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Dave Witbrodt
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Stan Hoeppner
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Steve Kemp
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Stan Hoeppner
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Paul Cartwright
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Celejar
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Arthur Machlas
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Stan Hoeppner
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Paul Cartwright
- Re: building a custom kernel:IT... Paul Cartwright
- Re: building a custom kernel-WA... Paul Cartwright
- Re: building a custom kernel-WA... Paul Cartwright
- Re: USB disk shows up late at boot Paul Cartwright
- Re: USB disk shows up late at boot Andrew Reid
- Re: USB disk shows up late at boot Hugo Vanwoerkom
- Re: USB disk shows up late at boot Andrew Reid