<e5ylm-7ry...@gated-at.bofh.it> <e5zy9-cm...@gated-at.bofh.it> <e5axg-2q7...@gated-at.bofh.it> <e5eet-7l...@gated-at.bofh.it>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:11:38PM -0500, Chris Jones wrote: [..] > > > I don't know if my video card takes care of that, but I find that > > > moving the cursor, scrolling, etc. is noticeably faster on a > > > framebuffer console than on the vga console. Mind you, since the > > > vesa driver does not support my display's native 1400x1050, I use > > > the atyfb driver. So I'm not sure how it would handle if I used the > > > vga=xxx modes. > > do you know if there is still a limitation of using the nvidia > > framebuffer and the nvidia binary driver ? [..] > > -- > > You will be the victim of a bizarre joke. > :-) > I the above question the bizarre joke, or was this meant as a reply to a > different post? Sorry didn't see this reply. The thread was about frame buffer and console resolution (atleast where I jump on). I was just asking weather or not there was still and issue with the proprietary nvidia X driver and the nv framebuffer driver - I remember before you could not use both at the same time, wondering if the same was try now I am presuming you have mistaken my signature for more than it is > CJ
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
