On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 07:43:29PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:09:58PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > On Sat,10.Apr.10, 11:38:08, Merciadri Luca wrote: > > > Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > > > > > > It doesn't matter. Mixing apt-get and aptitude is not a problem anymore. > > > > > > > Sure? How can you state this? Any proof? I always thought that they were > > > incompatible. > > > > I'm not sure what I can do to prove that something doesn't exist. I > > could for example post the console output of: > > I guess this was the big headach > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=411123 > >
I can't *prove* it because the point was implied, but there is August 2008 forum discussion where Daniel Burrows himself states "this hasn't been true for years." The issue is a broader point on compatibility with Synaptic, but apt-get is implied as Synaptic keeps no separate record from apt-get. http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=188382#p188382 -- Kind Regards, Freeman http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100410202210.ga9...@europa.office