On Sun, 30 May 2010 11:04:59 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Sat,29.May.10, 22:58:59, Brian Marshall wrote: >> >> Any idea why the default was changed? I guess it didn't really make >> sense to change the date format based on whether it was an ISO-8859 or >> UTF-8 locale? (en_US.ISO-8859, to my knowledge, has always used the >> date format that en_US.UTF-8 is now using.) > > Why not? This way people using other languages now have a localized > date.
Having an option to change the default is very good, but ISO date representation is there precisely to avoid the date localization madness, so I for one would also expect as default the using of ISO date standard. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.05.30.09.19...@gmail.com
