On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:27:18 -0400, Dan wrote: > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...) >>> But then I used service manager from gnome to disable bluetooth. It >>> disabled the service but it didn't delete the link. So I guess that >>> there is a standard procedure to disable the service without deleting >>> the link. Which is that procedure? >> >> I finally disabled the service by issuing "update-rc.d service_name >> disable". Full story here: >> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/12/msg00505.html >> >> > update-rc.d disable seems to be the best way. It renames the service so > that it starts with K instead with S. But I still do not know how the > gnome service manager is able to disable the service. It does not make > any change in the links in rc*.d and it does not make any change in > /etc/default/bluetooth Hum... good question, let's dig a bit. I also have "bluetooth" service disabled by using GNOME's "services- admin" utility and indeed the service seems to be off ("/etc/init.d/ bluetooth status" returns "failed!") _but_ "grep -i bluetooth /var/log/ syslog*" and "ps aux | bluetooth" both commands return traces of some kind of BT service/instance running in background/initalized :-? Also, /etc/rc.d/* levels shows "S20" for bluetooth links in 3,4 and 5 runlevels while they should be "K". Quite strange... Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.04.09.18.10...@gmail.com
