Lisi: > On Monday 19 March 2012 12:32:19 Jochen Spieker wrote: >> >> The OP has explicitly has explicitly stated that he/she is interested in >> the reason for the behaviour. Work-arounds are too easy. :) > > It's NOT a workaround. It is correct usage.
Sure it is correct usage, but it hides the reason of aptitude's
behaviour from our understanding.
> In aptitude if you want
> _everything_ upgraded, you have to say so, otherwise it will safe-upgrade
> and nothing will be removed, and some things will not be updated.
And we are interested to know what these "some things" are in this case.
> The reason for the behavior is apt-get != aptitude.
That explanation is not very exhaustive.
J.
--
If I was a supermodel I would give all my cocaine to the socially
excluded.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
