On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Lisi <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday 19 March 2012 14:17:44 Bonno Bloksma wrote: >> >> It is either a normal apt-get upgrade or an aptitude full-upgrade. But >> why.....? > > Because they are not the same? If they were identical there would be no point > in having the two of them.
No matter how different apt-get and aptitude are, it's reasonable to expect that, if there's a candidate for upgrading mysql-common, that both "apt-get upgrade" and "aptitude safe-upgrade" will install it; and if one of them wouldn't install them, it would be apt-get because, unlike "apt-get upgrade", "aptitude safe-upgrade" is liberal and will install new packages to satisfy dependencies. It would've been interesting to see the output of "apt-cache policy mysql-common" and "aptitude search -F '%c%a%M %p %v %V' mysql-common" to see whether the aptitude search would have shown a different value for "%v" and "%V". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=syxdm0bn4qt7pomkvowtycigreg8e92a_zaz2a8z9w...@mail.gmail.com
