On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:32:03PM +0100, Ellwood Blues wrote: > 2012/4/27 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net>: > > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 17:26 +0100, Ellwood Blues wrote: > >> http://mate-desktop.org/install/#debian > > > > No experiences here, but I heard that it shouldn't be a good successor > > of GNOME2. > > > > > I am deciding now which one is may favourite: Xfce or Mate, right now > I am on Mate and I love it. I am also interested on Jwm (pure Linux > old school, without BS, light and fast as light and without BS ). > > As linus said «We need a Gnome 2 fork» and in my opinion the name of > this fork is «Mate», we need Mate obviously.
There is Cinnamon done by the lead developer of Mint. It's probably more mature than MATE. I've run Cinnamon before and it's nice. The benefit is the classic look/behaviour of Gnome2 but using GTK3, so less buggy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120510053539.ga1...@thinkpad.gateway.2wire.net
