If you are using squeeze, and it works they way you it to. Then it is best to leave it as so. I prefer Gnome2 amongst any DE:very stable and configurable. The hardware I have is capable of running Gnome3, but I need something that will run on all hardware.
If it ain't broken, don't fix it. On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Stephen Allen <marathon.duran...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:32:03PM +0100, Ellwood Blues wrote: > > 2012/4/27 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net>: > > > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 17:26 +0100, Ellwood Blues wrote: > > >> http://mate-desktop.org/install/#debian > > > > > > No experiences here, but I heard that it shouldn't be a good successor > > > of GNOME2. > > > > > > > > > I am deciding now which one is may favourite: Xfce or Mate, right now > > I am on Mate and I love it. I am also interested on Jwm (pure Linux > > old school, without BS, light and fast as light and without BS ). > > > > As linus said «We need a Gnome 2 fork» and in my opinion the name of > > this fork is «Mate», we need Mate obviously. > > There is Cinnamon done by the lead developer of Mint. It's probably more > mature than MATE. I've run Cinnamon before and it's nice. The benefit is > the classic look/behaviour of Gnome2 but using GTK3, so less buggy. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/20120510053539.ga1...@thinkpad.gateway.2wire.net > >
