On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:36:14PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > And why do we need this? We could notarized emails + use or computer > readable ID cards, anyway, this in addition won't make mailing list > mails more true or less true. There's more untruth for notarized papers > than for non-notarized papers. Why should things become better with > openPGP signing?
I can't recall anyone arguing that it would improve the quality of discourse. All it does is help to prove who wrote what. Some see value in that, others do not. > Again, I don't care, even if I would see cryptic lines at the bottom of > my mails, but IMO we should avoid photos as thumbnails, PGP, HTML. You are entitled to that opinion ☺ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120511132931.GC1319@debian
