On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:36:38 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:44:12 +0200, Paul Seyfert wrote:
>
>> On 10.06.2012 17:27, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
> I wonder if the *Dingbats is the real problem here. If you had access to
> the original document you can ensure the symbols that display wrongly
> are infact using the ZapfDingbats fonts. I think so but is just to be
> sure.
Okay, I finally figured out what was the problem: it's not the
ZapfDingbats font but Symbol that makes a difference.
When I add this chunk of text into my "~/.fonts.conf" file, the PDF is
rendered correctly:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
<alias binding="same">
<family>Symbol</family>
<prefer><family>DejaVu Serif</family></prefer>
</alias>
</fontconfig>
"DejaVu Serif" font can be replaced by another one.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jr57bf$7p7$1...@dough.gmane.org
