On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 06:08, David Palmer. wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:40:29 +0100 > Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:25:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:20, David Palmer. wrote: > > > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:19:17 -0400 > > > > Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thursday October 9 at 11:29am > > > > > Edward Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > > ??? What's wrong with the 3c905B? Why shouldn't it work with AMD > > > systems? > > > > Indeed. That family of NICs work fine on my Athlon. [snip] > O.K., > Just the way I read it, I think. > 'you can't go wrong with intel', so I thought they wouldn't work off AMD. > Good to hear.
Ha ha. Intel isn't Microsoft. Thus, their hardware follow the specs exactly, just like all the other manufacturers. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA "Perl is worse than Python because people wanted it worse." Larry Wall, 10/14/1998 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]