On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:22:48 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Fri 10 Aug 2012 at 14:23:38 +0000, Camaleón wrote: > >> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:41:37 +0100, Brian wrote: >> >> > But the process of how the decisions are made and who makes them is >> > the same. >> >> Yes, but that does not change the fact a decision (being a big change >> or a small one) is wrong or badly put. > > So we have appropriate mailing lists and the BTS to express our views on > the quality of the decision for the choice of a default DE on CD#1.
Yes, and here we had a problem with communication: users were not aware about this "issue" until they've read it from external sources (blogs, magazines, etc...). I'm susbscribed to Debian News and Debian Announce (and now added debian-devel and debian-devel-anounce) in a hope of trying to track these changes/decisions very closely because I'm interested on them but I wonder if this is just an impossible goal to achieve unless normal users subscribe to all of the development mailing lists. > Apart from the one reference I have given previously I have seen nothing > of any substance yet. Sadly, me neither :-( > There is this thread which could be added to: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2012/08/msg00020.html Thanks, but still nothing clear (is a thread with only one reply which adds no additional info). Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k03gqf$qus$1...@dough.gmane.org
