On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:00:30 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Du, 12 aug 12, 15:08:02, Camaleón wrote: >> >> And for -boot and -cd, I can't see a strong reason to follow them, >> given that I have no direct relation with those projects (I'm neither a >> developer nor have opened any bug against them) and can't really track >> all mailing lists for every single project, there are many! > > You mentioned you are interested in the installer, so -boot is the > obvious choice.
Or debian-cd, right? :-) But I'm not interested in the installer "per se" but the decisions about the whole project, which of course, also involves the installer as a core part of any distribution. Maybe is that my complaint is more focused to an excesive "fragmentation" of the project that makes it very difficult to follow. >> Instead, I would have expected that important changes (like this) are >> broadcasted to some "key" mailing list (such as -devel-announce or >> -news). > > But it is not *yet*, there was just a commit in a repository, a new > package is not even uploaded to unstable. Besides, as already mentioned > by others, that commit might be reversed if they do manage to fit Gnome > on one CD. You mean a change on this can be still expected? I see no further discussions about the issuse on the above mentioned mailing lists, where is this being tracked/debated? Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k0b0eo$9nn$4...@dough.gmane.org