Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 19:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 07:21 -1000, Joel Roth wrote: > > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > dbus often is a PITA! > > > > > > Do you have experience with dbus's predecessors, such as > > > CORBA? > > > > No. I guess a predecessor won't help, if applications depend on dbus, > > such as jackd/jackdmp. I'm aware that I can use jackdmp without dbus, > > since I'm already doing this and I read that others are able to handle > > this dbus issue even when they run jack with dbus for sessions without > > X, IIUC. > > Oops, perhaps you mean that they were less good :D. I confused it with > the word "successor" and noticed it after I sent the mail. Perhaps D-Bus is not good, but maybe it is less bad?
I'll go on the record in favor of configurability: good to be able to opt out if you don't need it. ( /me doesn't know if he needs it or not. ) -- Joel Roth -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130409180409.GA16123@sprite
