On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> DBus isn't a problem per se, it just can cause issues, when implemented >> without thinking about the needs of all users? > > Right but it's actually much worse than that. Take mozilla firefox even > which may or may not have been changed due to me bringing it up on the > dev-security list. Without dbus in a chroot it would die, the reason > was handling it's text configuration files, which is obviously > rediculously pointless and I assume with some confidence, actually quite > dumb.
Are you sure about that? I have never seen anything dbus related in any version of Mozilla or Firefox, aside from one extension that never really when anywhere. Cheers, Kelly Clowers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFoWM=-3bnt0ofyokjo50amvjhx8vtgoaukq9dp5epkrnew...@mail.gmail.com