Until the motherboard died, I had both GNOME 3 and Xfce on my Wheezy laptop, and I'd go between one and the other.
I got quite used to GNOME 3. When I started mousing into the hot-corner on non-GNOME systems, I knew that GNOME Shell had won me over. But I'm still using Xfce from time to time. It's nice to have the choice. -- Steven Rosenberg http://stevenrosenberg.net/blog http://blogs.dailynews.com/click stevenhrosenb...@gmail.com ste...@stevenrosenberg.net On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:03 AM, "Morel Bérenger" < berenger.mo...@neutralite.org> wrote: > Le Mer 24 avril 2013 7:56, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : > > > > > On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 19:08 -0700, cletusjenkins wrote: > > > >> xfce looks the best of the bunch to me. > > > > Xfce4 has got to many GNOME dependencies. I'm using it since years, but > > I don't like it, I just couldn't find a good DE until now. Things for > > Xfce4 are as often broken, as they are for GNOME, assumed you expect a > > GNOME2/Xfce4 workflow. What I call broken, others might call features. > > Maybe you could take a look at LXDE? There are still dependencies to GTK2 > as XFCE, but those are not Gnome deps... > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/03b18fda48e0fdaa020c7a5a67454b92.squir...@www.sud-ouest.org > >
