On 8/27/13, Curt <cu...@free.fr> wrote: > On 2013-08-27, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote: >> >> Your general, non-direct reply to my questions to you, is by default >> consent to my implied positions. > > I can't parse that.
Sorry. I shall try again: I am saying Ralph ignored my questions to him (and ignored the things I said). And then I am saying I have a default response (default value) to Ralph's ignorance: a) because Ralph failed to response to what I said, b) I take it that Ralph is agreeing with me a) "He is not denouncing what I say" is the evidential 'limit' or the 'value' or the 'input' to my assessment function; b) and the output of my assessment function is that Ralph "consents to" (like agrees with) what I have stated. >> I _am_ still interested to know if you consider yourself to be a >> compulsive relationship-communication boundary tester? > > I think he considers that one size does not fit all. > What a traitor (or not)! Curt, I agree that that is Ralph's position. I also agree that one size does not fit all: Fedora is good, Debian is good, Gentoo is good. There are lots of great options. That's not what I said. Just there, I asked a question - "Ralph, do you like to boundary test relationships, by using conversation or conversation techniques?" and then "Do you do so compulsively?" I hope that makes sense. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNSQJQJt_raOJe2+5=3zm8jbq-uqvccvchunqiagmw68...@mail.gmail.com
