On 2013-09-02, Tom H <tomh0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > AFAICT, the "un" output of "-l" for vim-athena is because it's listed > in the "Recommends" field of vim-common, so it's recognized as a > package.
It seems to me, from what I can discern on my own system, that you obtain the 'un' output in the initial field when there is no description available for the package. Or is that completely stupid? Am I confusing the cause with the effect? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnl298db.2ph.cu...@einstein.electron.org
