On 9/3/13, Curt <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2013-09-02, Tom H <[email protected]> wrote: >> AFAICT, the "un" output of "-l" for vim-athena is because it's listed >> in the "Recommends" field of vim-common, so it's recognized as a >> package. > > It seems to me, from what I can discern on my own system, that you > obtain the 'un' output in the initial field when there is no description > available for the package. > > Or is that completely stupid? Am I confusing the cause with the effect?
I actually thought the same for a bit, but apt-cache show vim-athena seems to show description just fine. I think it may be due to "Recommends" by vim-common. Let's see what Tom can dig up. Tom - nothing to do with pinning by the way, that was just an example on my part. Thanks heaps Zenaan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNSTAcgOzF4an=rdtmn4bjrfhimjenzzwfss-9ty4sno...@mail.gmail.com
