> > > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:50:01 +0200 > > > Ralf Mardorf<ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > I'm speaking about upstream and here is one conflict: > > [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ sudo pacman -S mate-file-archiver > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-conflicts... > :: mate-file-archiver and file-roller are in conflict. Remove > file-roller? [y/N] >
Sorry, but why would one need mate-file-archiver (Engrampa) and file-roller on the same machine? The former is a fork of the latter (and to all practical means just the same package under different name). Same goes for nautilus/caja, gedit/pluma, etc. I think that either you use MATE DE and Engrampa replaces file-roller for you, or, if you want to install MATE on a system that already has some other DE with file-roller installed, that you want to keep, you install mate-base package, which (I believe) includes none of extra applications (and you can go on using file-roller under MATE). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131011204343.2a817907@moonpc
