On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Now, I wonder. Gnome was said portable, am I wrong? If they now have a hard > dependency on systemd, they can no longer be considered portable, since > systemd is itself only targeting linux kernels (and this is fine, since they > do not claim to be portable)?
GNOME is portable because there are porters willing to do the work. If they quit because the work's too time-comsuming or impossible, it'll stop being portable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SwyP65ptY1krbMJsW1m-4L=kvcrtljykfhhtxox9x3...@mail.gmail.com
