On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 14:11 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: > Ralf Mardorf writes: > > On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 06:59 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > > I still cringe when I think of the first time I replaced ethernet card > > > in a server and udev changed the name > > I had to patch the udev conf in a VM image template to overcome this :). > > > During setting up Arch Linux with systemd the device name switched from > > eth0 to enp3s0 on my machine. > > Any reason for this? > > This could create "a certain amount of work" to people used to > automate things by means of shell scripts...
It's not only work to edit scripts, but also a pain to remember such a counterintuitive name. IMO eth_ is easy to remember, whereas enp_s_ is horrible. When I had to troubleshoot why linux-rt > 3.8 doesn't run on my machine I didn't use my Arch install and journalctl, but compiled all the kernels for Debian and used the old faithful Debian log files. I didn't find the issue, but at least I could handle those old log files, while using journalctl makes me think about Seppuku :D. However, we need to become used to systemd, SysVinit/initscripts have no future, so we shouldn't waste additional time for lamenting ;). Yes, it's "a certain amount of work", perhaps we will used to it after a while. I'm using systemd since a long time now, but I was to lazy to care much about it and I like my Debian without systemd, while regarding to other "things" I prefer my Arch Linux install. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1392385432.7260.120.camel@archlinux