On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Bob Proulx <b...@proulx.com> wrote: > Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> Joel Rees wrote: >>> >>> This is precisely why systemd should have been brought up to speed in >>> a separate, parallel, volunteer-only distro. >>> >>> (If you don't understand what I mean by a separate, parallel, >>> volunteer-only distribution, think of kfreebsd, but a little closer to >>> home.) >>> >>> I'd still say there's time for debian to go for a course correction, >> >> Seriously? >> >> What is sid for? > > I believe the point was that it should be "make before break". They > should have allowed people to use systemd without preventing people > from not using it. They didn't make a new system without breaking the > old one. They broke the old one while trying to build the new one. > That is the problem. You shouldn't burn down your old house while you > are still designing and building your new house.
Had Gnome not had to rely on systemd as pid 1, we might not have had a CTTE bug, etc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=Sy85acEdV_FtAT7BvobHjPS=f=9i-fejphuta3jeko...@mail.gmail.com
