On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:45:12 +0900 Joel Rees <joel.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you a sockpuppet arguing ironically? If so, which side do you > support? Microsoft? I guess you're not interested in the previous post about ad-hominem... and... Oh! You mean unix sockets... hahaha! that's funny. I'm on the FOSS side. However, systemd is much better than sysvinit. And change has been in the works for the better part of the last 15 years - that's half of the purported 30 years of 'stable and unwanted change' of sysvinit. Look up simpleinit for what looks like a decent precursor to systemd. Furthermore there are Debian whitepapers published around circa 2002 regarding the short comings of sysvinit and the advantages of switching it out for a dependency based init. > Follow-ups, if any, on off-topic, please. You seriously must be joking if you think you'll just drop a personal insult on me and then sweep me off to off-topic... --Andrew References: https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2002/ols2002-pages-176-182.pdf http://www.safe-mbox.com/~rgooch/linux/boot-scripts/ https://people.debian.org/~hmh/debconf2/debconf2-initscripts-bkg.pdf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140828192150.6150f30c033627714c4fc...@1024bits.com