On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:15:10 +0200 Bzzzz <lazyvi...@gmx.com> wrote: > Treating sysV of "overly complex" against systemd is… quite intriguing > (to stay polite and avoid referring to brain and other things;)
All of the above is opinion, not source code based, and has nothing at to do with anything other than -- I don't want to use it... I've been using GNU/Linux for at least 15 years. I've programmed in many languages - my favorite being assembly. I find bash scripting to be rather cumbersome, and I find systemd significantly easier to use than sysvinit... after I read through the documentation, that is... So, I guess I'm just the odd anomaly? I suppose /everyone/ who runs GNU/Linux finds bash scripting easy in comparison to filling in sectioned off lists of options, except me? And I suppose there are no users 'out there' who have read about systemd and are eagerly learning how to use it to their advantage rather than moaning about changing how something is done? I somehow don't think so... Further the NSA has guns. They control the agenda because they can shoot you... We're talking about open source software here... If anyone wants to: apt-get source sysvinit is all you need to type in order to compile your own init and run it on whatever machine you wish... So, the NSA comparison is complete rubbish and a total red herring. Troll-baited... sure... however, I would hope that at the very least those wishing systemd away have at least /looked/ a little at the documentation and configuration of systemd. --Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140828093251.4646ed815ea2e490cc8e5...@1024bits.com
