On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:30:22AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:58:26PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: >> > True, it's a single point of failure, but it's made by GNU, whose >> > agenda is less harmful to Linux than the agenda of Redhat. >> >> I nearly choked on my coffee reading that. Redhat built their business on >> Linux; GNU have been hostile towards it for years. > > And the most interesting thing is that for many years glibc was > maintained by Ulrich "Stop Reopening" Drepper who was paid by Red Hat > for this task :) > Glibc maintainer style was the main reason of glibc → eglibc transition > in Debian.
Just for fun, I did a search on "gnu vs. redhat". One of the more amusing links that popped up: http://www.informit.com/library/content.aspx?b=red_hat_linux7&seqNum=12 Irony abounds. -- Joel Rees Be careful where you see conspiracy. Look first in your own heart, and ask yourself if you are not your own worst enemy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAAr43iOci2nUC1YD=_7oaCHuU+dv5Pev0zF6E7L=tavshmh...@mail.gmail.com
