On 12/10/14 18:13, John Hasler wrote:
Martin Read writes:
I'm not seeing a serious problem with that function.
You have no problem with an 1800 line function?
The thing that you are asking me if it is the case is not the thing I said.
I have a problem with 1800 line functions in general; they're clearly
undesirably long. I don't have a *serious* problem with 1800-line
functions *in general*, though they're certainly on my list of things
that should be refactored.
Moving on to the specific case, I don't have a *serious* problem with
that particular 1800-line function. It certainly merits refactoring (I
can even see an obvious starting point for doing so), but it's not
unreadable or hard to follow; it's just inconveniently long.
But while we're on the topic of things I have a problem with, here's
one: people choosing to interpret "I'm not seeing a serious problem with
that function" as "I have no problem with that function" :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543ac220.8060...@zen.co.uk