On 10/15/2014 4:44 PM, Joe <j...@jretrading.com> wrote: > However, if the Reply-To: is forged, i.e. if it is spam, the > alternative is considerably less OK. Bouncing a spam message simply > delivers *the* *entire* *message* to an innocent third party, having > been laundered through your (presumably legitimate and respectable) mail > server. > > So it isn't OK, but there's no alternative to doing it. That's how you > have it both ways.
Spam doesn't have to be deleted, it can be quarantined. That is the best way to handle spam once it has been accepted. I don't even delete the malicious stuff, although I don't deliver it to the recipient. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543fa10c.6010...@libertytrek.org
