Hi. On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:24:16 +0100 Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat 18 Oct 2014 at 14:28:26 +0200, Peter Nieman wrote: > > > On 17/10/14 20:25, Brian wrote: > > >Why > > >it needs to be compiled without dbus is also unknown. > > > > You're asking the wrong question. The question you should ask > > yourself is: if claws-mail works perfectly well without dbus, then > > why does Debian ship a version that depends on it? > > claws-mail does not depend on dbus. This page tells otherwise: https://packages.debian.org/jessie/claws-mail OK, it's 'libdbus-1-3', not 'dbus' dependency, but libdbus-1-3 recommends dbus. Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141018172928.87ac10bb28c00572bbcb0...@gmail.com
