On 19/10/14 00:29, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:24:16 +0100 > Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > >> On Sat 18 Oct 2014 at 14:28:26 +0200, Peter Nieman wrote: >> >>> On 17/10/14 20:25, Brian wrote: >>>> Why >>>> it needs to be compiled without dbus is also unknown. >>> >>> You're asking the wrong question. The question you should ask >>> yourself is: if claws-mail works perfectly well without dbus, then >>> why does Debian ship a version that depends on it? >> >> claws-mail does not depend on dbus. > > This page tells otherwise: > > https://packages.debian.org/jessie/claws-mail > > OK, it's 'libdbus-1-3', not 'dbus' dependency, but libdbus-1-3 > recommends dbus. > > Reco > > I think, based on the words used, Brian means "depends" not "recommends" i.e.:- apt-get --no-install-recommends install claws-mail will install claws-mail (and a host of other files) without libdbus
But I suspect he'll gently correct your tangential confusion. Kind regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54426584.70...@gmail.com