Scott Ferguson wrote:
Good question Patrick - top posted as I'm referring to the Subject.
On 21/10/14 06:45, Patrick Bartek wrote:
After much vitriolic gnashing of teeth from those opposed to systemd,
I wonder... What is a better alternative? And it can't be sysvinit.
Yes. Syvinit still works, but it is after all 20 years old. It's been
patched and bolted onto and jury-rigged to get it to do things that
weren't even around (or dreamt of) at its inception. It's long past
due for a contemporary replacement. Whatever that may be.
So, what would you all propose? For a server? Or for a user desktop?
Or something that fulfills both scenarios? And why?
One of the difficulties is that there is no clear distinction between a
desktop and a server - just degrees.
Um, yes, there is. Typically different hardware (headless for
starters), storage area networks, clusters, high availability, as well
as different role, and so forth.
Miles
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5445dcb3.4030...@meetinghouse.net