Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Ludovic Meyer wrote:
Even with the addition 10 to 20 people posting on systemd,
it shouldn't be a issue.
Andrei's point was not that the list /infrastructure/ was at risk, but
that debian-user - this list - was essentially subject to a denial of
service, because it's main purpose - user support - was impeded by the
amount of systemd/-vote watching posts taking place.
Particularly all those posts by folks saying "don't talk about systemd"
- seems to me there's about a 3-1 multiplier effect. Complain about
systemd (or even ask about a problem with it) and 3-5 people immediately
weigh in to simply say "shut up." Talk about DoS.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5446606f.6090...@meetinghouse.net