Who are these folks who insist on jumping into discussions and insisting
that people shouldn't be having it, or otherwise generating lots of
irrelevant noise - because they disagree or are not interested in, or
whatever?
Mark Carroll wrote:
"Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI" <ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org> writes:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:24:13 +0100
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <o...@debian.org> wrote:
Let's attempt an analogy: if several members of a literature club
started to use the literature club room to (lively) discuss their common
interests in motorbikes, ice creams or ponytails,
Your analogy does not hold water since the on-going discussion is central to
the use of Debian: i.e. whether or not many users will be able to continue
using it.
Indeed. It's certainly of assistance to me as a Debian user to know what
the potential issues are with systemd as packaged/provided by Debian,
and what my alternatives are (whether adjusted systemd configuration, or
alternative init system) and how they might be achieved within a Debian
context. Details of how to do it outside Debian are off-topic.
Talk of forking does seem a bit premature though. Even post-jessie I'd
hope that it often suffices to just build some alternative binary .debs
from the Debian source packages but compiled with different options, so
they may depend on less; I'm sure somebody could offer hosting for such
a supplementary repository. I'd also hope that how to use Debian's
source packages and toolchain to create differently compiled packages to
be installed into a Debian system is pretty much on-topic too though!
-- Mark
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/545b6c9d.9030...@meetinghouse.net
