Le 11/11/2014 20:21, Don Armstrong a écrit : > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Erwan David wrote: >> Le 11/11/2014 18:59, Don Armstrong a écrit : >>> When I (or someone else) asks people to "show us the code", it's >>> really just shorthand for "someone needs to do this work, and it >>> currently isn't important enough for me to do it." >> Asking to provide a patch to an utterly complex code is just >> [complete] [nonsense] and [hypocrisy]: one cannot patch any complex >> software without working on it for long hours. > While it might take less time for someone intimately familiar with a > piece of code to provide a patch, it still may take a lot of time for > them to provide the patch. The actual cost may be even higher even > though it takes less time, because writing a patch means that they're > not working on something else. > > It's the reality of Free Software that people work on things that they > want to work on. If something is important to you, but not important > enough for you to do it, then your next best alternative is to figure > out how you can best encourage someone else to do it for you. Calling > people hypocrites isn't a very effective way to do that. > >> And when the probleme is te basic design of the software a patch is >> not conceivable. > Then the solution is to become involved in the software design process. > Your email makes me me regretting contibuting by translating doc (a long time ago) otr contibuting bugs...
This kind opf stance is completely full of contempt agains non coders. But coders are nothing if nobody uses or test. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546266ee.4070...@rail.eu.org
